Actually
what else can one expect from lawyers of terrorists’ families? It is not that
families of suspected or actual terrorists do not have a right to appoint
lawyers. But to see eminent people
wholly defending terrorists despite knowing fully well that they were
terrorists indeed, and trying to frame innocent people, waging war on the
nation’s Intelligence officials is disgusting. Mukul Sinha is the lawyer of
Sheikh Javed.
Right
since 2002- Mukul Sinha has always called the 2002 riots as ‘genocide’. Here in
June 2002 he says: “Please don’t say this was a riot. It was a genocide, pure
and simple”.
Sadly for Mukul Sinha,
it was exactly the opposite. Please don’t say this was genocide. It was a riot, pure and
simple. By lying Mukul Sinha has violated 153-A (needless
infuriating a community) and 499-500 of IPC (defamation). But the terrorists’
lawyer will always whitewash Muslim acts of murder. If he could go to the extent of denying the basic fact that a mob of
fanatic Muslims, barbaric killers, roasted to death 59 innocents, including 25
women and 15 children in Godhra, then he will certainly lie and hide the fact
that even after Godhra, Muslims were equally on the offensive and attacked and
killed hundreds of Godhra and made 40,000 Hindus homeless and move to refugee
camps in Gujarat.
The
story of Muslims attacking and killing Hindus in Gujarat under Narendra Modi’s
rule even after Godhra can be clearly understood by reading this.
The Hindu reported on 2nd March,
2002:
“But
unlike Thursday (i.e. 28th February) when one community
was entirely at the receiving end, the minority backlash (on 1st March)
caused further worsening of the situation.
Police
presence had little impact on the two communities pelting stones at each other
in Bapunagar, Gomtipur, Dariapur, Shahpur, Naroda (Muslim
concentrated areas) and other areas from where incidents of firing had been
reported. But there were no reports of casualty. Pitched
battle was continuing between the two communities late in the
evening.
The official
sources said timely arrival of the police foiled a retaliatory
attempt to break into a prominent temple in Jamalpur locality in the walled
city.”
The Indian
Express reported
on 2nd March, 2002: “(On 1st March)
Tension escalated in the walled city areas just before the Friday prayers.
There were violent clashes between mobs in Jamalpur, Bapunagar and Rakhial.”
Clearly, Muslims were on the offensive.
And
The Times of
India also reported the same day: “There were signs of retaliation
in areas like Juhapura, Kalupur, Dariapur and Shahpur….” This
clears all possible doubts.
India Today in
its issue dated 15th April, 2002 reported:
“On 13th March, the Supreme Court’s ruling banning any religious
activity in Ayodhya proved a psychological setback to the Vishwa Hindu Parishad
and its affiliates. It was also the day when some people in the walled city of
Ahmedabad burst crackers in celebration and unfurled banners saying: ‘You darkened
our skies. We will spill your blood on the streets.’
…the next few days saw mayhem. In Ahmedabad, violence broke out on 17th March
when Dalits in the Danilimda area were attacked by Muslims. On
19th March, it was Modasa, a town in Sabarkantha
district. A police officer’s son was stabbed and two communities went
berserk. A local LIC building was attacked during office hours.
The stories only got more macabre. In Himmatnagar, a young man, who went to a Muslim-dominated area
to do business, was found dead, with his eyes gauged out. In Bharuch,
the murder of a Muslim youth led to mass violence. Next, the Sindhi market and
Bhanderi Pole areas of Ahmedabad, hitherto calm, were attacked by mobs.
This phase,
really, was one of Muslim mobs attacking Hindus.
…take Umreth, a little town in the Anand district that had practically never
witnessed communal violence. This year it did and when a local BJP leader,
Vishnu Patel tried to pacify a Hindu crowd, it turned on him.
…other than inefficiency, the authorities face some genuine problems in trying
to arrest the culprits. Combing operations in Muslim-dominated areas have
been rendered difficult. In Juhapura, just outside Ahmedabad, residents (i.e. Muslims) cut
the power lines and gathered mobs of human obstacles when the Army arrived to
conduct search operations at night. This experience was by no
means unique, it was repeated in areas like Kalupur and Gomtipur (all Muslim
areas). Locals explained it as ‘spontaneous’, police officials said it only
provided cover for criminals to remove arms and immunition.” (Source:
http://www.indiatoday.com/itoday/20020415/states.shtml).
The Times of India reported dated 18th
March, 2002 in an article titled: “Riots Hit
all Classes, People of All Faith” – “Contrary to popular belief that only
Muslims have been affected during recent riots more than 10,000 persons
belonging to Hindu community have also become homeless.”
Some
Muslims even attacked Hindu doctors- as reported by The Times of India.
Muslims
also burnt 50 Hindu shops in Ahmedabad in March 2002 reducing Hindus’
life-savings to ashes. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/4609603.cms
None
other than Marxist leader Brinda Karat also admitted that Hindus and
particularly Dalits were also homeless.
Ofcourse there is direct evidence of Muslims
being on the offensive as till now 80 Muslims have been convicted for attacking
and killing Hindus in Gujarat AFTER GODHRA.
Despite this truckload of irrefutable
evidence of attacks and sufferings of Hindus, Mukul Sinha says that “Please
don’t call it a riot”. Are the lives of
the hundreds of Hindus also killed even after Godhra not worthy of anything? As
on 5 March 2002, out of the 98 relief/ refugee camps opened 85 were for Muslims
and 13 were for the Hindus. As of 25 April 2002, out of the 1 lakh 40 thousand people
in relief camps, 1 lakh were Muslims and 40,000 were Hindus. What else to
expect from terrorists’ lawyers- whitewashing Muslims’ attacks on Hindus and
sufferings of Hindus and calling it a ‘genocide’.
And claiming
that it is the “TruthofGujarat”! Fabricating outrageous, inflammatory and
defamatory lies and calling it “TruthofGujarat”. This is blatant violation of
153-A and 499-500 by Mukul and Pratik Sinha and their lie-manufacturing factory. Unable to
refute anything on merit, they resort of disgusting lies of saying that www.gujaratriots.com ‘justifies’ riots!
deal all
ReplyDeleteplease for the sake of India, dont keep talking like muslim killed hindus and hindus killed muslims..we dont need riots and bllod sheds...teh only way is to abstain from inciting rhetorics, u r wrong i am right kind of argument..all are wrong if resort to oevr action and oevr respond..control yrself..
inda needs clean cities towns, streets villages, homes, jobs, raising stnd of life nothing else...pititng one pple agains t another wont help teh cuase at all gujarat or anywher in india u will see bony slim oldies under rag tag dilapidated huts cursing teh fate of life in this indai..do u have any suggestion to change that...i am born a muslim hope taht is not a criminal offnce